When video first made its way into the classrooms at this well-known Ivy League university, it did so as it had at so many other institutions – informally.
A handful of enthusiastic instructors independently sought out recording tools to support specific elements of their classrooms. When things worked well, they then pushed their departments to formally support those tools.
Over the last two decades, video proved to be a useful resource at the university – capturing lectures and labs for study and review, streaming classes and campus events for off-site viewing, enabling instructors to flip classrooms and assign video assignments, and more.
Yet, while classroom video had become valuable to faculty and students alike, it had just as quickly become cumbersome for the school’s learning technology team.
In 2014, the university’s Technology Architecture Committee commissioned a report to better understand the full spectrum of video-related services that were currently in use at the school. What the committee found were challenges related to the inconsistent and inefficient use of video.
Over time, the school had organically adopted a range of video services. Both Echo360 and Kaltura had been purchased as primary video systems, although Vimeo, YouTube, and iTunesU were commonly used as well. Altogether, the committee reported the university had:
For administrators, the decentralized approach to video required staff to maintain a complex web of solutions across campus. For students, it meant that accessing recorded lessons required them to first learn each of these solutions.
In response to this feedback, the institution began its search for a unified video platform that could address the needs of faculty, staff, and students in all departments.
The university’s Center for Teaching and Learning, Information Technology Services team, together with representatives from six of the institution’s professional schools, reviewed the capabilities of eight video platforms.
Each platform was evaluated based on a range of criteria, including:
In the end, Panopto was found to best meet the university’s requirements, having scored highest on all three of the school’s highest priorities: ease of use, video creation and curation, and accessibility. After an extensive review, the working group members voted unanimously to adopt Panopto to replace the school’s existing contracts with Kaltura and Echo360.
“Video has become a fundamental part of how our students learn on-campus and online,” the manager of collaboration technologies in the university’s Center for Teaching and Learning says. “As we scale the use of video across campus, it’s imperative that we have an integrated system for video management and lecture capture. Based on our evaluation criteria, Panopto emerged as the clear choice.”
Along with the committee’s comprehensive analysis, the university wanted to understand how faculty would experience Panopto in the classroom.
After Panopto had been selected, three instructors were invited to use the video platform in their spring semester courses. When the pilot concluded, each enthusiastically supported making the move to Panopto.
A senior instructor in economics found Panopto exceptionally easy to use. “Panopto’s video library is much more usable than the other platforms I’ve used. Likewise, Panopto’s search is miles better. I especially like that it automatically indexes every word spoken and shown in my presentation, and that the search results point to the exact moment in the video where the search term is used.”
A senior lector in Spanish and Portuguese, meanwhile, was pleased with her ability to use Panopto to make her classroom more interactive. “It was great to be able to use Panopto to comment directly on the videos, then open up a discussion for the students.”
A senior lecturer in East Asian languages and literatures also reported the video platform more than met her expectations. “Panopto was very easy and convenient for course members to use, both faculty and students. I’d absolutely recommend Panopto to other instructors.”